Cookie consent by cookie-banner.ca
Cn
Company News

Key Words: Silicon Wafer Dicing PCB Depaneling Glass Cutting

Home > News > Company News

Client Case Studies: Selective Laser Ablation of Multilayer Composite Film

Publish Time: Sep. 03, 2026

【Description】:

Evaluating selective laser ablation of 4-ply PET/Aluminium composite film using the Chanxan CW-6050Z 355nm nanosecond UV laser system, delivering a 12-fold processing speed increase over picosecond solutions.

Case Study | Roll-to-Roll Laser Micromachining

A Nanosecond UV Laser Solution for High‑Speed Heating Circuit Patterning

Material: 4-Ply PET / Aluminium Composite Film
Equipment: Chanxan CW-6050Z
Key Metric: 12× Speed Boost vs Picosecond
12×
Throughput Increase
<20 µm
Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ)
10 Sec
Cycle Time / 20×20mm Window
>95%
Target Production Yield

1 Project Background & Production Challenge

When a Chinese manufacturer of flexible electrothermal elements set out to replace their chemical etching line with a dry, mask‑free process, they faced a deceptively simple requirement: remove the top insulating PET layer from a four‑ply composite film, precisely exposing the aluminium foil beneath, without damaging that foil—and do it fast enough for roll‑to‑roll production.

The material was a composite film with a clear hierarchy: PET (insulating topcoat), aluminium foil (the functional heating layer), PE adhesive, and PET backing. Their target was to create heating circuit patterns by opening windows along predefined traces—essentially converting the film into a flexible heating element for electric vehicle battery packs and smart home thermostats.

4-ply composite film selective laser ablation
At first glance, the job looks like a textbook case of selective laser ablation. In practice, it turned out to be a tightrope walk over three conflicting constraints:
  • The top PET layer had to be completely vaporised with zero residue.

  • The aluminium surface had to remain pristine with no melting, oxidation, or pinholes.

  • The heat‑affected zone (HAZ) had to stay below 100 µm to prevent short circuits between adjacent traces spaced just 0.5 mm apart.

Why Traditional Methods Failed:
Mechanical Scraping PET’s toughness produced frayed edges and inconsistent depth. Overcutting punctured the 15 µm foil, while undercutting left stubborn remnants.
Chemical Etching Delivered precision but caused severe undercut (>0.2 mm linewidth deviation), long mask changeover times, and hazardous chemical waste.

Neither traditional method was acceptable for a production line targeting >95% yield and sub‑minute cycle times per heating unit. That’s when the project team turned to advanced laser processing—and quickly realised that not all lasers are created equal for multilayer film laser processing.

2 Technical Evaluation: Wavelength & Pulse Duration

1. Why UV? The Absorption Advantage

Polymer films like PET absorb strongly in the ultraviolet spectrum. A 355 nm laser doesn’t melt the material; it breaks molecular bonds via photochemical decomposition, effectively chipping away the layer with minimal heat diffusion. Infrared wavelengths (1064 nm or 9.3 µm CO₂) would have produced molten edges and a heat‑affected zone wider than 200 µm—ruling them out immediately. So the choice narrowed to UV laser film processing, but the pulse‑width decision proved far more interesting.

UV Laser Absorption and Ablation Comparison

2. Nanosecond vs Picosecond – The 12× Productivity Gap

The client initially considered a picosecond UV laser, attracted by its ultra‑low thermal impact. However, a side‑by‑side trial revealed a dramatic trade‑off. Picosecond sources deliver high peak power but very low single‑pulse energy—typically less than 50 µJ. To uniformly ablate a 50 µm PET layer, the scanner must trace dense hatch lines with tiny overlap, forcing the galvanometer to make thousands of extra jumps. For a typical heating window of 20 × 20 mm, the picosecond system took nearly two minutes.

In contrast, the nanosecond UV laser (355 nm, 15 W average power, 200 kHz repetition rate, ~12 ns pulse width) offered >200 µJ per pulse. With a 35 µm spot and 25 µm hatch spacing, it cleared the same window in just 10 seconds—a 12‑fold improvement in throughput.

ParameterPicosecond UV LaserChanxan Nanosecond UV Laser
Single Pulse Energy<50 µJ>200 µJ (Tuned to 75 µJ)
Processing Time (20×20mm)~120 seconds10 seconds (12× Faster)
Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ)10–20 µm≤20 µm (Spec 100 µm)
Cost & ROI EfficiencyHigh capital expenditureHigh ROI / Production Ready

Yes, the nanosecond laser produces a slightly wider heat‑affected zone (60‑80 µm un-optimized versus 10‑20 µm), but the client’s subsequent lamination process covers the aluminium surface, making minor edge oxidation differences irrelevant. Given that cost per watt is also significantly lower for nanosecond sources, the decision was clear: nanosecond UV was the pragmatic, production‑ready winner.

3 Production Workflow: The Chanxan CW-6050Z Solution

At the core of this roll-to-roll production line is the Chanxan CW-6050Z nanosecond laser micromachining system. For this specific application, we equipped it with a 355 nm ultraviolet (UV) laser source (15 W average power)—a wavelength chosen specifically to match the high photon absorption of the 50 µm PET layer, enabling clean photochemical decomposition rather than thermal melting.

Client Case Studies: Selective Laser Ablation of Multilayer Composite Film
Figure 2: Chanxan CW-6050Z system configuration for roll-to-roll multilayer ablation.
High Mechanical Precision
Granite base and linear-motor-driven X/Y/Z stages deliver ±3 µm positioning repeatability and total accuracy ≤25 µm, ensuring pristine 0.5 mm trace spacing.
Optimized Process Window
Scanning speed tuned to 1200 mm/s with 75 µJ pulse energy, maintaining HAZ ≤20 µm (far under the 100 µm limit).
Real-Time Endpoint Detection
Proprietary software triggers real-time endpoint control upon reaching the reflective bare aluminium foil, instantly halting exposure to prevent substrate damage.

The closed-loop control is seamlessly integrated with Chanxan’s proprietary software, which accepts standard CAD formats (DXF, DWG, AI, PLT, BMP, and LAS).

After ablation, the system’s optional automation interfaces allow this entire process—from unwinding to inspection to rewinding—to run continuously with minimal operator intervention. Finally, the qualified rolls are laminated with a protective cover film and rewound, ready for electrode attachment. The entire cycle per typical heating window (20 × 20 mm) takes just 10 seconds.

4 Broader Takeaway & Market Application

This project is a compelling example of how composite film laser processing can be tailored to real‑world production constraints. The key was not chasing the highest‑spec laser, but matching the selective laser ablation parameters to the specific material stack—PET over aluminium—and accepting a slightly larger HAZ in exchange for a 12‑fold speed gain.

Today, the same solution is being evaluated for flexible circuit coverlay opening and OLED thin‑film encapsulation patterning. But for now, it has already delivered one clear victory: transforming a tricky multilayer film into a high‑yield, high‑speed heating element production line—without a single drop of chemical etchant.

Custom Engineering & Testing Available

Ready to Optimize Your Laser Processing Line?

From flexible electronics and precision glass processing to complex multilayer film ablation, Chanxan Laser designs custom laser equipment tailored to your exact material, yield, and throughput targets. Send us your samples for process verification and proof-of-concept testing!

✓ Free Sample Trial ✓ Ultrafast, UV, CO₂ laser Technologies ✓ Custom Automation Integration

Previous: Troubleshooting X/Y Axis Motion Faults in Laser Machines: A Practical Guide

Next: LaserCAD Machine-Software Communication Failure: Complete Troubleshooting Guide